HELICOPTER OR FIXED-WING AIRCRAFT: A COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS FOR MOOSE SURVEYS IN YUKON TERRITORY

Authors

  • Cor M. M. Smits
  • Richard M. P. Ward
  • Douglas G. Larsen

Abstract

The cost-effectiveness of using helicopters and fixed-wing aircraft in stratified random block surveys for moose is compared in two areas of Yukon Territory, Canada. Low-intensity stratification surveys were carried out with fixed-wing aircraft in both areas. Subsequently a number of sample units in each of 3 moose density strata were surveyed by helicopters in one area and fixed-wing aircraft in the other area. Sightability bias was determined by high-intensity searches of subsections of some sample units by helicopter in both areas. To achieve similar precision levels in moose population estimates, the fixes-wing technique was shown to be 15.9% more expensive than the helicopter technique at current helicopter and fixed-wing aircraft charter rates. This seemed to be the result of a greater sightability correction factor and associated sampling variance with the fixed-wing technique compared to the helicopter technique. Helicopter charter rates would have to by >4.6 higher than fixed-wing aircraft rates for the fixed-wing technique to be more cost-effective.

Downloads

Published

1994-01-01

How to Cite

Smits, C. M. M., Ward, R. M. P., & Larsen, D. G. (1994). HELICOPTER OR FIXED-WING AIRCRAFT: A COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS FOR MOOSE SURVEYS IN YUKON TERRITORY. Alces, 30, 45–50. Retrieved from https://alcesjournal.org/index.php/alces/article/view/933